Sponsored Link
Email This Post Email This Post

USPS Has a Plan: Investments, Cost Reductions, ‘Other Strategies’

USPS
USPS Has a Plan: Investments, Cost Reductions, 'Other Strategies

A politician quipped, “There’s no DeJoy in the Post Office tonight,” after Postmaster General Louis DeJoy announced his 10-year plan to revive (rescue?) the US Postal Service on Tuesday. The US Postal Service also announced the formation of a task force on service performance at specific locations within the postal network.

The 10-year plan, called Delivering for America, will help put the organization on a path to financial sustainability, according to General DeJoy.

Some of the key changes that news headlines are keying in on are slower mail, higher rates, and cuts to post office hours. But the USPS said the plan would put the organization on a strong financial footing, describing the “Total Plan Benefit” as follows:

  • $58 billion: Legislative and administrative action: Includes Medicare integration and eliminating the pre-funding requirement;
  • $44 billion: Regulatory changes via Postal Regulatory Commission: Includes pricing flexibility for market dominant products;
  • $34 billion: Self-help management initiatives: cost improvement: Includes mail processing, transportation, retail, delivery, and administrative efficiency.
  • $24 billion: Self-help management initiatives: revenue improvement: Includes package growth, new competitive products and pricing changes and revenue from package volume and price increases.

The last bullet point means higher rates for packages, hitting online sellers directly in the pocketbook.

But the second bullet points also cites higher prices – by loosening restrictions on how much the Postal Service can raise rates for mail (market dominant products). That was an issue raised last year – see this November 30th article in Government Executive for details.

It’s interesting to hear what the Postal Service sees as key challenges. In a “plan at a glance” document (PDF), it states:

The Problems We’re Addressing through the Implementation of This Plan:

  • Hastened shift in demand away from mail to packages
  • Misaligned mail and package processing operations
  • Underperforming air and surface transportation network
  • Unattainable First-Class Mail service standards
  • Prolonged underinvestment in retail and delivery network
  • Misaligned and redundant organizational design
  • High turnover rate within our noncareer employee workforce
  • Long-overdue pricing regulation changes from the PRC
  • Onerous legislative and administrative mandates

The American Postal Workers Union (APWU) issued a press release saying there were elements of the plan it would support and elements of the plan it would oppose.

Of special concern to the APWU is the slowdown of mail and reduction of services at a time when it says the public is demanding faster delivery of mail and packages. It said proposals that would slow the mail and reduce retail services, including reducing operating hours at post offices, would have a negative effect on postal workers and the public.

While some lawmakers have similar concerns, according to the Washington Post, the newspaper explained which areas Congress controls and which it does not. For example, “The postmaster general unilaterally controls operating hours at post offices, and the board of governors appears to back DeJoy’s changes to delivery times,” the Post explained.

The mail slow-down is getting a lot of attention, but according to the Delivering for America plan, “The First-Class Mail 3-day service standard requires a complex and high cost transportation network to cover vast geographic areas.”

It notes that the Postal Service does not own planes and is forced to rely on third parties for air transport.

“The scarcity of airplane and truck capacity, and the industry competition for both of those transportation modes, impacted our ability to deliver throughout 2020 and especially during the peak holiday season.”

It goes on to say, “Increased package volume, a dispersed processing network causing products to travel excess mileage, and an extremely distributed collection process to pick up increasingly smaller mail volume make it impossible to meet our current service standards, or do so at a reasonable cost.”

While many see the mail slow-down as problematic, one thing generally seen as a positive in the plan: the intention to preserve six-day mail and expand seven-day package delivery.

The full plan in PDF format on this page of the USPS website contains details and the rationale for changes.

And here’s how the Postmaster General and other postal executives sold the plan to postal employees in a video.

You can weigh in with your thoughts on the plan below and on the EcommerceBytes Blog, “Uh-oh: USPS Rate Changes Ahead.”

Ina Steiner on EmailIna Steiner on LinkedinIna Steiner on Twitter
Ina Steiner
Ina Steiner
Ina Steiner is co-founder and Editor of EcommerceBytes and has been reporting on ecommerce since 1999. She's a widely cited authority on marketplace selling and is author of "Turn eBay Data Into Dollars" (McGraw-Hill 2006). Her blog was featured in the book, "Blogging Heroes" (Wiley 2008). Follow her on Twitter at @ecommercebytes and send news tips to ina@ecommercebytes.com. See disclosure at EcommerceBytes.com/disclosure/.

5 thoughts on “USPS Has a Plan: Investments, Cost Reductions, ‘Other Strategies’”

    1. Trump did.

      eBay’s negotiated an exclusive deal with China Post and USPS and 2010. Obama and Biden sat back and did nothing as eBay and its Communist Chinese vendors bankrupted USPS. USPS always made money on foreign mail prior to eBay’s agreement. In 2010 USPS’s profits on foreign mail were greatly reduced as eBay’s new shipping label program was able to run for 1/2 of 2010. From 2011 onward USPS lost increasing amounts due to eBay’s abuse of a 1969 UPU program. After being contacted by concerned citizens, Trump threatened to withdrawal from the UPU if the abusive pricing was not stopped. When other nations ignored him, he began the 1 year withdrawal process. Faced with not having access to the largest economy on earth via their mail systems the other countries agreed to fix the issue.

  1. @RL15

    Are you kidding? Trumps gone-Biden/Obama back. Now US portion of E-Packet Free to Chinese sellers.
    Cant have US citizens making any money.

  2. In some cases, rail could replace trucks. At one time the Postal Service shipped some magazines relatively short distances rail in containers to reduce backhaul costs. While air will continue to be dominant for first-class mail and lightweight packages, containers shipped long distance by rail and short distance by trucks could lower the US Postal Service carbon footprint and increase reliability if managed with reliability as a top priority.

  3. @RL15

    That was supposed to have happened in July when DeJoy took over, but he is only worried about his investments in other competitors that he lied about during his confirmation hearings. The worse that USPS performs or increases their costs to US Sellers, the more that start using the companies that he is invested in and he gets even richer. They need to fire him before he completely destroys what is left of the USPS as we all know it. If Congress were to get rid of that $5 billion a year prefunding of retirees medical retirement benefits they would no longer need all of these changes to break even once again. But that is not what he wants to do as it is not in DeJoys BEST INTEREST!!!!

Comments are closed.