Covering auctions, collectibles and marketplace selling.
The AuctionBytes Blog has been giving a voice to online merchants since its launch in 2005. Named one of the world's top 30 blogs in 2008 by "Blogging Heroes." Weigh in with your thoughts on the joys and pitfalls of selling online.
|Sun June 8 2014 14:56:47|
Could Sellers Benefit from the Amazon - Hachette Standoff?
By: Julia Wilkinson
| You've probably heard about the battle between Amazon.com and Hachette; it's been all over the media, and EcommerceBytes covered it recently. In many reports, Amazon is made out to be the big bad wolf, and Hachette, a large company which includes book imprints Grand Central; Orbit; Hyperion and Little, Brown; is Little Red Riding Hood, while the two companies renegotiate terms.|
However, I'm not sure all media reports have laid out all the facts and their context. In one summary of it in the LA Times, "the specific argument is understood to be about e-book pricing, both retail and wholesale," and "...the larger conflict is about the publishing ecosystem and Amazon's role in it."
So if it's about e-book pricing, the background of the dispute goes back to the Apple e-book case brought by the Department of Justice, where publishers who "were accused of colluding over e-book prices; all settled," according to the Times piece. "The judge's final order in the case, issued in 2013, laid out a schedule for the various publishers involved to renegotiate e-book prices with retailers, Apple and Amazon both. Hachette is up first."
So what's going on is a renegotiation, per a judge's order, and it seems to be largely about e-book prices and not the prices of physical books, although evidently some of Hachette's paper copy books which are not yet released are showing up as unavailable on Amazon. But, as Amazon pointed out, consumers do have other options for getting books which are affected by the situation, including to buy from Amazon's third-party booksellers:
"If you do need one of the affected titles quickly, we regret the inconvenience and encourage you to purchase a new or used version from one of our third-party sellers or from one of our competitors," Amazon said.
So some third-party sellers who can produce the titles affected, say by walking over to a physical bookstore once they are in stock, buying them, and sending them to Amazon's FBA program at a higher price, might benefit.
However, if it's the profit breakdown of ebooks which is being haggled over, one must remember that third-party sellers can't sell ebooks on Amazon. But what's happening is a renegotiation of terms in a free market; is that so evil? In its Kindle forum post, Amazon pointed to this blog post by "The Cockeyed Pessimist" Martin Shepard, who is - surprise! a small publisher. (His bio says he is co-publisher, The Permanent Press, Sag Harbor, NY).
Shepard cites a New York Times piece, "As Publishers Fight Amazon, Books Vanish"
which said "The literary community is fearful and outraged - and practically begging for government intervention."
"They then cite three publishers, none of which I would consider great examples of the “literary" community - or even the larger community of book publishers to prove their thesis," wrote Shepard.
"As far as this literary publisher is concerned this article is poppycock," he goes on. "It starts with the assumption that Amazon is bad and gathers meagre material to prove its point. The last time I checked, Literary Market Place listed over 2,000 book publishers in the United States. Yet Streitfeld and Eddy (authors of the Times piece) quote only one independent publisher in paragraph three (Dennis Loy Johnson of Melville House) saying, about Amazon, "How is this not extortion? You know, the thing that is illegal when the Mafia does it?""
He adds, "From my point of view, Amazon is the very best thing any small independent press could ask for," and says, "In truth, everyone wants more of the pie." He says his small literary fiction outfit has been publishing "for 35 years, and in the past found that the chain bookstores took few if any of our titles, that distributors like Ingram demanded bigger discounts from us than they charged the conglomerates, or that despite winning more literary awards per title than any other publisher in America we could not match the print review coverage afforded to authors of the five big conglomerates."
What about the evil Kindle? He writes:
"Earnings from Kindle sales are excellent as both publisher and author find more profit (especially when we, as publishers, split eBook income on a 50:50 basis with our writers) with virtually no production costs. I've heard that most of the bigger houses don’t do this, writing contracts giving most authors only 25% of electronic income. Perhaps some of the authors complaining about Amazon on social media, would be better served if they complained to their publishers, like Melville or Hachette, if they are not getting 50% of this pie.
So, actually, the bigger picture here is probably not that Amazon and Hachette are having a (I expect temporary) dispute, but that the literary world is going largely electronic. As that happens, I expect third-party sellers will look more to the obscure and the out-of-print books, or the not-available-in-e-format books, or the collectible signed pieces.
That is, if they're not too busy writing and selling their own ebooks.
Sellers on the forums I checked today didn't seem too concerned about this situation. What do you think about it, as an online seller? Are you more sympathetic to Amazon, Hachette or neither? If you sell books, do you worry about the impact of the literary world going more electronic? Post a comment here!
Comments (8) | Permalink
Login is required to post comments.
To sign in to leave a comment using your AB Verify User Name, fill in the form below. If you have not yet signed up for AB Verify, or if you'd like more information, go to the Registration Page.