I thought about titling this blog post "Are 99 Cent Auctions Dead?," but decided that was overly dramatic. I've seen some discussion of this strategy lately, and wanted to investigate it further. If you sell on eBay or other auction sites, do you still price your items, or even some items, at 99 cents to start? (I don't mean with a reserve).
There seem to be situations in which it makes sense, and others where it is too risky. In the eBay Guide, "Why I start all my auctions at $0.99," eBayer "stamptraveller" advises us to start all or most of our auctions at 99 cents, for the following reasons (summarized/paraphrased by me in places):
- "If you start an item at $0.99 (or lower), you will definitely attract more bidders than if you start it at even $5 (regardless of its intrinsic value)." Also, people who set e-mail alerts with a maximum starting bid amount in the Search settings won't see your auction if you start it too high.
- "If you set a low starting bid, people will be inclined to view you as "fair,"" says "stamp." This is as opposed to being a greedy jerk (the latter being my words).
This certainly does not mean everyone will see your above 99-cent auctions as being overpriced, but haven't we all had that "gimme a break!" feeling when seeing some sellers' opening bids?
- "As long as the item has some definite value, you will always make a sale." Stamp says he is often pleasantly surprised by his ending prices, but on a couple of occasions over the years he was disappointed. It averages out well over time, he asserts.
- "With a low starting bid, having attracted more bidders, you are likely to see some dramatic competition at the end of the auction. This happens to my auctions virtually every time. If you have a relatively high starting bid, you will have less potential buyers watching to begin with and there will be little room left for any serious increase in bidding at the end."
So, how has this strategy worked for "stamp" lately? Well I took a look at some of his (or her?) auctions, and here are how the most recent ones went:
27 Canada Used Minisheets with some Recent 2012 Issues +$10 Whale All Fine Used
Starting bid: $0.99
Winning bid: US $61.10, with 19 bids. (Note, image below does not show final bids; it ended at $61.10).

Australia Used QEII Minisheet Plus Complete Bathurst sheet plus IP High Values
Starting bid: $0.99
Winning bid: US $18.75, with 8 bids
Great Britain UK GB 2012 Olympic Gold Medal set of 29 with 6 minisheets + extras
Starting bid: $0.99
Winning bid:US $43.68, 24 bids
So, this strategy seems to be working fine for "stamp."
However, someone else out there is frustrated: "Who else is done listing auctions at .99?" he asks. Granted, the site is not eBay, but blowoutcards.com.
"Have a bunch if items ending tonight, and it seems like everything that has ended so far is well below average closing prices. I don't know if I'm just unlucky or what, but I'm done selling for .99 anymore. It seems like the majority of the time you are leaving money on the table and getting screwed," he writes.
"I am just going to list my auctions at the minimum price I want auction style and if they sell they sell. So tired of getting the shaft 90% of the time." He conclueds, "Unless you have some super hot player, running .99 auctions are just asking to take it in the culo."
Culo..I may need to Google that. My feeling? If it's something you can't afford to have sell at $0.99, put the least amount you'll be satisfied with. Otherwise, I'm going to play around with starting some of my long-sitting merchandise at 99 cents.
What has your experience been with the 99 cent auction? Do you still use it, and why or why not? Or, have you moved to more fixed-price items? Post a comment here!